1941 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL (204 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 62. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 20 kg more than 1941 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 62 | SL |
| Year Released | 1941 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 2799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 204 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2520 mm |
