1941 GAZ M1 vs. 2010 Mazda 3

To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 69 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 GAZ M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 GAZ M1 would be higher. At 3,285 cc (4 cylinders), 1941 GAZ M1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (167 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1941 GAZ M1. (49 HP @ 2800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1941 GAZ M1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 3 weights approximately 13 kg more than 1941 GAZ M1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1941 GAZ M1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 GAZ M1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mazda 3 has automatic transmission and 1941 GAZ M1 has manual transmission. 1941 GAZ M1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: