1942 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Tundra (242 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 295 kg more than 1942 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Buick 40 | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Buick | Toyota |
| Model | 40 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 242 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1950 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3270 mm |
