1942 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Matiz
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Buick 40 (163 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Matiz. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Buick 40 weights approximately 875 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Buick 40 | 2010 Chevrolet Matiz | |
| Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
| Model | 40 | Matiz |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5249 cc | 995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 930 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2350 mm |
