1942 GAZ M1 vs. 2001 MG ZT
To start off, 2001 MG ZT is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 GAZ M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 GAZ M1 would be higher. At 3,285 cc (4 cylinders), 1942 GAZ M1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 MG ZT (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1942 GAZ M1. (49 HP @ 2800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1942 GAZ M1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 MG ZT weights approximately 205 kg more than 1942 GAZ M1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 GAZ M1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 GAZ M1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG ZT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 GAZ M1 | 2001 MG ZT | |
| Make | GAZ | MG |
| Model | M1 | ZT |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2001 |
| Engine Size | 3285 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 2800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2760 mm |
