1942 Volvo PV 801-10 vs. 2009 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2009 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Volvo PV 801-10 | 2009 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Volvo | Mitsubishi |
Model | PV 801-10 | Colt |
Year Released | 1942 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 3670 cc | 1332 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2500 mm |