1945 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1986 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1986 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Thunderbird (162 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 22 kg more than 1986 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1986 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 6C | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1945 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 79.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1378 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 54 L |