1946 Austin 16 vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1946 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1946 Austin 16. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1946 Austin 16.
Because 1946 Austin 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Austin 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1946 Austin 16 (146 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1946 Austin 16 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Austin 16 | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | 16 | Micra |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 46 L |
