1946 Buick 40 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 60 kg more than 1946 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Buick 40 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | 40 | CTS |
Year Released | 1946 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5249 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 109.5 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2880 mm |