1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 237 more horse power than 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V. (107 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
| Model | 170 V | UTE |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1766 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 281 HP |
| Torque | 107 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
