1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C (94 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 6C | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1948 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2490 mm |