1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre vs. 1964 Austin Mini Cooper
To start off, 1964 Austin Mini Cooper is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 76 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre weights approximately 470 kg more than 1964 Austin Mini Cooper.
Because 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Austin Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre | 1964 Austin Mini Cooper | |
Make | Aston Martin | Austin |
Model | 2-Litre | Mini Cooper |
Year Released | 1948 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2040 mm |