1948 Simca 5 vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Simca 5 would be higher. At 1,460 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Clio (81 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1948 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1948 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Clio weights approximately 615 kg more than 1948 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1948 Simca 5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Simca 5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Simca 5 | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Simca | Renault |
Model | 5 | Clio |
Year Released | 1948 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 570 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 14 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3220 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1280 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2580 mm |