1948 Volvo PV 60 vs. 2011 Citroen C4
To start off, 2011 Citroen C4 is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Citroen C4 (87 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1948 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C4 should accelerate faster than 1948 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 373 kg more than 2011 Citroen C4.
Because 1948 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Volvo PV 60 | 2011 Citroen C4 | |
| Make | Volvo | Citroen |
| Model | PV 60 | C4 |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 3670 cc | 1358 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 87 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1257 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2610 mm |
