1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1981 Lancia Beta
To start off, 1981 Lancia Beta is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 340 kg more than 1981 Lancia Beta.
Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Lancia Beta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1981 Lancia Beta | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Lancia |
Model | 6C | Beta |
Year Released | 1949 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 1583 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 51 L |