1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2005 Ford Freestyle
To start off, 2005 Ford Freestyle is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Freestyle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Freestyle (210 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (94 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Freestyle should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Freestyle weights approximately 422 kg more than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Freestyle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2005 Ford Freestyle | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 6C | Freestyle |
Year Released | 1949 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1796 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2760 mm |