1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2008 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2008 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Saab 03-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Saab 03-Sep (255 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 25 kg more than 2008 Saab 03-Sep.
Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2008 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Saab |
Model | 6C | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 1949 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2680 mm |