1949 Buick 40 vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo V50 (207 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (148 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 427 kg more than 2003 Volvo V50.
Because 1949 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Buick 40 | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | Buick | Volvo |
| Model | 40 | V50 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5249 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 109.5 mm | 93.2 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1865 kg | 1438 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2670 mm |
