1949 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Maybach 62
To start off, 2010 Maybach 62 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Maybach 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Maybach 62 (631 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 483 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (148 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Maybach 62 should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Maybach 62 weights approximately 1011 kg more than 1949 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Buick 40 | 2010 Maybach 62 | |
| Make | Buick | Maybach |
| Model | 40 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5249 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 631 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1865 kg | 2876 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3828 mm |
