1949 Buick 40 vs. 1982 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 665 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1949 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Buick | Chrysler |
Model | 40 | Le Baron |
Year Released | 1949 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5249 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1865 kg | 1200 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2560 mm |