1949 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 428 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Buick 40 | 2009 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | 40 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1949 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 6162 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 542 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2890 mm |