1949 Holden FX vs. 1996 Honda CR-V

To start off, 1996 Honda CR-V is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Honda CR-V (128 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1949 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1949 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda CR-V weights approximately 528 kg more than 1949 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Honda CR-V (180 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 1996 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Holden FX. 1996 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1949 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1949 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: