1949 Jaguar XK vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1949 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Jaguar XK | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XK | 6 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2610 mm |