1949 Riley RM A vs. 2013 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2013 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Riley RM A would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1479 kg more than 1949 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Toyota Sequoia has automatic transmission and 1949 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1949 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Sequoia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Riley RM A | 2013 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Riley | Toyota |
| Model | RM A | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 376 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 2714 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1955 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3100 mm |
