1950 Allard K1 vs. 1984 Subaru Rex
To start off, 1984 Subaru Rex is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Allard K1 weights approximately 457 kg more than 1984 Subaru Rex.
Because 1950 Allard K1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Subaru Rex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K1 | 1984 Subaru Rex | |
| Make | Allard | Subaru |
| Model | K1 | Rex |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 548 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1067 kg | 610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 32 L |
