1950 Austin A 40 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 40 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 512 kg more than 1950 Austin A 40.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Austin A 40. (84 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Austin A 40 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Austin | Mini |
| Model | A 40 | Countryman |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 47 L |
