1950 Bristol 450 vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Bristol 450 (153 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Bristol 450 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 1997 MCC Smart | |
Make | Bristol | MCC |
Model | 450 | Smart |
Year Released | 1950 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1460 mm |