1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1250 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Bristol 450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Bristol | Jeep |
Model | 450 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1950 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 82 L |