1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (305 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Commander weights approximately 668 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Bristol 450 | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Bristol | Jeep |
| Model | 450 | Commander |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5650 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1398 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 80 L |
