1950 Ferrari 195 vs. 2006 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Ferrari 195. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Ferrari 195 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1950 Ferrari 195. (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1950 Ferrari 195. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 765 kg more than 1950 Ferrari 195. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Ferrari 195 | 2006 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Ferrari | Ford |
Model | 195 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2341 cc | 4015 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 100.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.8 mm | 84.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1715 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 61 L |