1950 Holden FX vs. 2004 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2004 Mazda B2300 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B2300 (143 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 473 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 2004 Mazda B2300 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | FX | B2300 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 143 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1443 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3200 mm |
