1950 Riley RM A vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 335 kg more than 1950 Riley RM A.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 1950 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1950 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Riley RM A | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
| Make | Riley | Cadillac |
| Model | RM A | ATS |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 317 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4643 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1417 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2776 mm |
