1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 2012 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. (164 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 142 kg more than 2012 Mazda CX-7.
Because 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 2012 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Mazda |
Model | Phantom | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5673 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 244 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 1718 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5770 mm | 4681 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1872 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3690 mm | 2751 mm |