1951 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1984 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 1984 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 320 kg more than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1984 Buick Skyhawk | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Buick |
Model | 6C | Skyhawk |
Year Released | 1951 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2580 mm |