1951 Allard K2 vs. 2002 Audi A4
To start off, 2002 Audi A4 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A4 (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi A4 weights approximately 365 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2002 Audi A4 | |
Make | Allard | Audi |
Model | K2 | A4 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2391 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2770 mm |