1951 Allard K2 vs. 2004 Buick LeSabre
To start off, 2004 Buick LeSabre is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick LeSabre (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 434 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 2004 Buick LeSabre | |
| Make | Allard | Buick |
| Model | K2 | LeSabre |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 205 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1629 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2880 mm |
