1951 Allard K2 vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 388 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Allard | Mazda |
Model | K2 | Tribute |
Year Released | 1951 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1583 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2620 mm |