1951 Allard K2 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak has automatic transmission and 1951 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1951 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak | |
Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
Model | K2 | Kodiak |
Year Released | 1951 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 6600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2000 mm |