1951 Allard K2 vs. 2009 Audi TT
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K2 weights approximately 300 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 1951 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1951 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2009 Audi TT | |
Make | Allard | Audi |
Model | K2 | TT |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3188 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2480 mm |