1951 Allard K2 vs. 2010 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2010 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saab 03-Sep (207 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2.
Because 1951 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Saab 03-Sep has automatic transmission and 1951 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1951 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Saab 03-Sep will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2010 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Allard | Saab |
Model | K2 | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 1951 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4646 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1438 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2675 mm |