1951 Austin A 40 vs. 1985 Mazda 323
To start off, 1985 Mazda 323 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,324 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Mazda 323 (66 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Austin A 40 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1985 Mazda 323.
Because 1951 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Mazda 323 (101 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Austin A 40. (80 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1985 Mazda 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Austin A 40 | 1985 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Austin | Mazda |
| Model | A 40 | 323 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1324 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 80 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 870 kg |
