1951 BMW 340 vs. 2012 Renault Megane
To start off, 2012 Renault Megane is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 BMW 340 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Megane (221 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1951 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1951 BMW 340.
Because 1951 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 BMW 340 | 2012 Renault Megane | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | 340 | Megane |
Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2630 mm |