1951 GAZ M-20 vs. 1983 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 1983 Skoda Rapid R is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Skoda Rapid R (62 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1951 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Skoda Rapid R should accelerate faster than 1951 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 610 kg more than 1983 Skoda Rapid R.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 GAZ M-20 (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. (99 Nm @ 2850 RPM). This means 1951 GAZ M-20 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Skoda Rapid R.
Compare all specifications:
1951 GAZ M-20 | 1983 Skoda Rapid R | |
Make | GAZ | Skoda |
Model | M-20 | Rapid R |
Year Released | 1951 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 99 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2850 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2410 mm |