1951 GAZ M-20 vs. 2002 Pontiac Solstice
To start off, 2002 Pontiac Solstice is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Pontiac Solstice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Pontiac Solstice (240 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1951 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Pontiac Solstice should accelerate faster than 1951 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 142 kg more than 2002 Pontiac Solstice.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Pontiac Solstice (305 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm). This means 2002 Pontiac Solstice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 GAZ M-20 | 2002 Pontiac Solstice | |
| Make | GAZ | Pontiac |
| Model | M-20 | Solstice |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 2120 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1318 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2830 mm |
