1951 Humber Pullman vs. 2004 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 132 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 345 kg more than 2004 Lincoln LS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Humber Pullman | 2004 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Humber | Lincoln |
Model | Pullman | LS |
Year Released | 1951 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4085 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 232 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 120 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2032 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2910 mm |