1951 Jaguar MK V vs. 2003 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XF is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 7,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jaguar MK V weights approximately 300 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Jaguar MK V | 2003 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
| Model | MK V | XF |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 7000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1240 mm |
