1951 Riley RM A vs. 1957 Riley 2.6
To start off, 1957 Riley 2.6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Riley 2.6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Riley 2.6 weights approximately 405 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Riley RM A | 1957 Riley 2.6 | |
| Make | Riley | Riley |
| Model | RM A | 2.6 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1957 |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 2639 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 101 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2890 mm |
