1951 Talbot Baby vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 249 more horse power than 1951 Talbot Baby. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1951 Talbot Baby.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Talbot Baby | 2008 Holden UTE | |
Make | Talbot | Holden |
Model | Baby | UTE |
Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 2690 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 357 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |