1951 Toyota SA vs. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Toyota SA would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban (320 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 293 more horse power than 1951 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1951 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1373 kg more than 1951 Toyota SA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Toyota SA | 2010 Chevrolet Suburban | |
| Make | Toyota | Chevrolet |
| Model | SA | Suburban |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 995 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 320 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 2543 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 5649 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2009 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1951 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3302 mm |
