1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1988 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1988 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Toyota 4Runner (141 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 390 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1988 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1988 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
Model | 6C | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1952 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2958 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 82 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2630 mm |